Make Agency: scenarios, integrations and AI steps
MAKE WORKFLOWS THAT DELIVER
With Make we automate recurring processes between SaaS tools, APIs and AI steps. Fast to start, clean to operate.
What is Make?
Make is a cloud service for visual automation. Workflows are called scenarios: you build them from modules that each perform an action in a tool, and steer the data flow with routers, filters and loops. For systems without a ready-made module, there are HTTP and webhook building blocks.
As a decision-maker, two points matter. Make bills in credits: most modules use one credit per run, AI features more depending on the model. And data location is tied to the organization: Make offers data zones in the US and in the EU. According to Make, some AI features still run in the US even in the EU zone – we check this before every AI step.
Whether Make or Zapier fits better is covered further down. If your data shouldn't leave your premises at all, self-hosted n8n is the alternative.

One lead, four steps, zero manual work
Run the sample workflow: form submission in, contact into the CRM, message to the team, confirmation by email – step by step with a log. Switch on the failure to see retries and the error branch. Everything is a simulation in your browser, nothing is sent.
Lead workflow as we build it with Make
- Trigger: formNew request via the contact form
- Create CRM contactCreate contact with company and source
- Slack/Teams messageSales gets the lead in their channel
- Email to the leadConfirmation with the next step
- Error branchTicket for the admin, lead stays in the CRM
- Execution steps
- 0
Log
- No run yet – click “Run”.
Sample workflow as a simulation, nothing is sent. Every attempt counts as one execution step here – how the vendors bill executions differs.
What we build with Make
Bookable individually or as a project. If Zapier, n8n or a custom backend fits better, we tell you up front.
How your Make project runs
Cost and duration depend on scope. Our project calculator gives you a first range; the binding figure comes with the offer after the workshop.
Brands that work with us
Pros and cons of Make
Pros
- A visual editor where even branching flows with routers and loops stay readable.
- Many ready-made modules for SaaS tools, plus HTTP and webhook blocks for your own APIs.
- No server of your own needed; scenarios run in the cloud straight away.
- Error routes, retries and execution logs are built in.
- With a short introduction, business teams can adjust simple scenarios themselves.
Cons
- Billing is in credits, so costs rise noticeably when each run handles many records.
- Cloud only, with no option to run it on your own servers.
- Version control, testing and staging are weaker than in classic software development.
- Complex data transformations quickly become hard to follow in the interface.
- Scenarios are tied to the platform, so moving away means rebuilding them.
Is Make right for you?
A good fit if …
- you want to connect SaaS tools such as CRM, newsletter, spreadsheets and project management quickly.
- your processes have branches and several steps but do not justify a software project.
- you want to start without infrastructure and see results fast.
- business teams should understand the flows and make small changes themselves.
Probably not if …
- you process very many records a day and per-credit pricing adds up.
- compliance rules say your data must not leave your own infrastructure.
- the automation is business-critical core logic with strict testing and release processes.
- you already run a self-hosted workflow server or integration platform.
We are Make workflow builders
We structure Make scenarios so they are not just clickable but also maintainable and traceable.
- SaaS integrations, webhooks and API orchestration
- Error paths, retries and notifications
- AI steps with validation and approvals
- Documentation and handover for operations

Make or Zapier?
We work with both. What matters is the logic of your workflows, who maintains them and where the data may live. Answer four questions and see which way it leans, and why. The weighting follows the decision table below.
Question 1 of 4
What do your workflows look like?
All trade-offs as a table
When Make – and when Zapier?
We work with both. What decides is the logic of your flows, who maintains them and where the data may be stored:
| Decision | Lean toward Make | Lean toward the alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Logic of the flows | Make, if a flow branches, iterates over lists or heavily transforms data between steps. | Zapier, if the flows are straightforward: one trigger, a few actions, maybe a filter. |
| Who maintains them | Make, if someone on the team can handle data structures and APIs and keeps developing the scenarios. | Zapier, if business teams without technical background should set up their automations themselves. |
| Data location | Make, if processing in the EU matters and the EU data zone is enough for that. | Zapier, if processing in the US is acceptable after checking with your data protection officer. |
| Connected tools | Make, if your tools have a module or can be addressed cleanly via HTTP. | Zapier, if you want to connect many smaller SaaS tools and a ready-made integration for each matters more than the logic in between. |
As of October 2026
A fast path to productive automation
Make suits process chains that need to connect multiple tools. We model triggers, states and handoffs so teams understand and control the flow.
Visual orchestration with API depth
Standard modules accelerate setup; HTTP and custom calls cover edge cases. The workflow stays flexible without becoming opaque.

Monitoring and fault tolerance
Automation only saves time when errors become visible early. We add alerts, retry logic and manual fallback paths.
AI plus process logic
Make is strong when classical logic and LLM steps come together. We combine evaluation, routing and human-in-the-loop where decisions must be safeguarded.

Selected references
Marketing and sales processes
Qualifying leads, enriching contacts and triggering campaigns: Make connects data sources and systems without a long platform project.
Internal process chains
Status changes, escalations and data synchronization can be implemented quickly with Make when error handling and ownership are clearly defined.

Make Data & Insights
All postsWhen is Make worth it – and when is it the wrong choice?
How do you actually go about building a Make scenario?
How do you connect Make to our existing systems like CRM, shop or ERP?
What happens when a step in the workflow fails?
Can we operate and extend a Make scenario ourselves later on?
Your edge with Make
Visual automation quickly turns into hard-to-maintain scenarios. We build Make workflows with clear responsibilities, data flows and operational concepts.
Fast delivery without losing control
Clean API and webhook architecture
An eye on operations, fault tolerance and scaling
A combination of AI, integration and process expertise
Ready for your Make project?
Let's talk about your requirements – we'll get back to you within one business day with concrete next steps.
What's it about?

Paul Kalisch
Executive Partner
- 30 minutes by video or phone
- You talk directly to a partner, not to sales
- You get the order of steps, risks and rough costs
Related services and technologies for Make
- ServiceAI Consulting & Process Optimization
- ServiceProcess Automation & AI Workflows
- ServiceProcess Analysis & AI Strategy
- ServiceAI Chatbots & Digital Assistants
- TechnologyZapier
- TechnologyIFTTT
- TechnologyLangChain
- TechnologyAnthropic Claude
- TechnologyOpenAI












