Who is affected
The BFSG applies to e-commerce services provided to consumers after 28 June 2025 (section 1 (3) no. 5 BFSG). That means websites and apps through which consumers conclude contracts (section 2 no. 26 BFSG), for example online shops.
Since 28 June 2025, Germany's accessibility act (BFSG) has required many online shops and digital services to be accessible. The check opens your home page and one subpage in a real browser and tests them against WCAG 2.1 and 2.2, levels A and AA.
An automated test finds only part of the barriers. It does not confirm BFSG compliance and is not legal advice.
Automated tests find only part of the barriers. The check reliably shows the errors that can be measured. Whether people with disabilities can really use your website only shows in a manual review.
The check therefore does not promise that your website complies with the BFSG. Not legal advice.
The key points in brief, each with its reference in the German act. Whether your offer falls under the law is a question for your legal counsel.
The BFSG applies to e-commerce services provided to consumers after 28 June 2025 (section 1 (3) no. 5 BFSG). That means websites and apps through which consumers conclude contracts (section 2 no. 26 BFSG), for example online shops.
Microenterprises that offer services are exempt (section 3 (3) BFSG). A microenterprise employs fewer than ten people and has an annual turnover or annual balance sheet total of no more than EUR 2 million (section 2 no. 17 BFSG).
Providers must state in their terms and conditions, or in another clearly noticeable place, how their service meets the requirements (section 14 BFSG, Annex 3). This includes a description of the service, explanations of how it is carried out, a description of how the requirements are met and the competent market surveillance authority. This information must itself be accessible.
In practice EN 301 549 and WCAG serve as the benchmark; the act itself refers to harmonised standards (section 4 BFSG). For websites, EN 301 549 adopts WCAG 2.1, levels A and AA.
As of 3 October 2026. Not legal advice.
The check uses axe-core, Deque's open-source testing library. Every rule belongs to a WCAG success criterion and has a severity.
The score is the weighted share of passed rules from 0 to 100. Critical rules count 10, serious 7, moderate 3 and minor 1. A rule counts as failed as soon as it reports a violation on one of the pages checked. Rules that find nothing to test on the pages are left out. With at least one critical finding the score is capped at 79.
The score only compares automated rules. 100 means: no automatically measurable violation on the pages checked.
The classification comes from axe-core.
Sources: BFSG, German Accessibility Strengthening Act (in German) · Section 14 BFSG (in German) · Annex 3 BFSG (in German) · EN 301 549 V3.2.1 (ETSI, PDF) · WCAG 2.2 (W3C) · axe-core (Deque)
The report is the start. This is how it continues:
Contrast, missing alternative text and labels are often something your team can correct itself. The report names the element, the rule and a fix hint.
Start the checkWe test with keyboard and screen reader what the automated run cannot see: navigation, forms, checkout, media. You get a prioritised list by WCAG success criteria.
Request an auditWe remove the barriers in theme, components and content and supply the technical details for your accessibility statement. The legal review stays with your legal counsel.
Discuss implementationRelated: Meeting obligations: BFSG, e-invoicing, AI Act · Digital Stack Builder · Security Check
Your question isn't here? Ask us directly
Send us your report or just the domain. We'll tell you which findings matter first, what a manual audit covers and who should fix them: your team or us.