Dr. Lena
The Researcher
Kill score 91
„A self-aggrandizing blog post masquerading as a guide – stuffed with unverified statistics, zero named client proof, and a navigation that screams: we do everything, master of nothing.“
Ten AI buyers read your landing page like your toughest customers – and tell you, with a Kill-Score and concrete fixes, what makes them bounce.
Works for any publicly reachable landing page, homepage or blog article with a conversion goal.
10 testers · 10 buyer psychologies
We unleashed the roast on one of our own blog articles first. The verdict was brutal – and valuable for exactly that reason: kill score 91 out of 100, recommendation: do not ship it like this. Here is an unedited excerpt.
Kill score
Do not ship
7 of 10 examiners would bounce.
Dr. Lena
The Researcher
Kill score 91
„A self-aggrandizing blog post masquerading as a guide – stuffed with unverified statistics, zero named client proof, and a navigation that screams: we do everything, master of nothing.“
Andreas
The Risk-Averse
Kill score 91
„No visible guarantee anywhere, no fallback option, no risk mitigation above the fold. I bounce before I ever trust this provider with my architecture.“
Jonas
The Procrastinator
Kill score 87
„The page never calculates what waiting costs me. I leave with full knowledge and zero urgency – and I never come back.“
And this is how concrete the fixes get (P0 issue from the same report):
Flagged by 7 of 10 examiners
Location on the page: „Slawa Ditzel CEO“
The author byline shows a name and title but no photo, no LinkedIn, no credentials, no years of experience. The authority claim is unearned and unsupported.
What to change: Add verifiable authority signals right next to the byline.
Concrete suggestion
Slawa Ditzel, CEO | 8 years of Shopware implementation | Certified partner | LinkedIn profile | plus a photo and a direct reply link.
Why: B2B buyers verify individuals before companies; unsupported CEO claims on agency blogs are ignored as unaccountable.
Real, shortened excerpt from a roast of our own page (June 2026). Your report follows exactly the same structure – with your quotes, your issues, your fixes.
Not a generic feedback tool: every examiner carries its own buyer psychology or audit framework – and only looks for the reasons NOT to buy.
Six buyers, each with their own psychology – every one hunting only for the reason NOT to buy.
Marek
The Burned One
Trusts no number without a source.
Sandra
Spouse-Veto
Defends the budget internally.
Tobias
The Comparison Shopper
Five competitor tabs open.
Jonas
The Procrastinator
Likes everything, does nothing.
Dr. Lena
The Researcher
Verifies every statistic.
Andreas
The Risk-Averse
Thinks worst case first.
Four mechanical frameworks with no feelings. They test every claim against its proof.
Puts every promise on the page next to its proof. Unsupported claims end up in the report.
Maps your buyers' objections and checks whether the page answers them – or ignores them.
Walks the buying moment step by step: where exactly does the page lose the visitor who is ready to decide?
Checks for attackable claims: unsupported superlatives, questionable statistics, legally risky wording.
Three steps, no registration, no sales call.
Enter the address of your landing page – any publicly reachable page works.
You receive a 6-digit code by email. A code is valid for 15 minutes and good for exactly one roast.
After 60–90 seconds your report is ready: kill score, quotes from all examiners and prioritized fixes with concrete copy suggestions.
Frequently asked questions about the AI Roast
If your kill score hurts: we build landing pages that survive reviews like this. Talk to us about your fixes – no strings attached, based on your report.